It was my pleasure talking with you yesterday. Thank you for leaving your reel with me.
Since you asked my opinion, I will tell you with complete honesty my thoughts. Remember, I am but one person, with one opinion.
First - I think you have some beautiful work on your reel. You are clearly talented and passionate and it shows in your work.
But....
Your reel does you a disservice.
What are the "articles" you show - are they articles that featured you or articles that you wrote? Whichever the case, I cannot read them, and so they are unclear. I think if they are important to you, you should post them as PDFs on your website - but they do not have a place on your reel.
Second, all the festival logos become redundant - and seem to be saying - how great the work is....but I don't want to read that, I want to see it - so cut to the quick and show your work.
When I opened your aerial link you begin with quotes about how great the aerial photography is....but what are the other shots you show? did you shoot those, or are those simply to provide context for the aerial work? It is confusing.
I am not able to find your name with the title - director of photography or cinematographer anywhere on your reel, or on the cover for the dvd. Did I miss something? In a pile of 300 DVDs, how will I know that yours represents your work as a cinematographer? Why would someone pick it up from the pile and watch?
Remember that in general (with few exceptions) people are busy, not generous with their time nor patience, not willing to do extra work for a stranger, and not always that smart. So help them -
Your clips are too long.
Your reel to be a director or to be an editor will want to be different, but for a cinematography reel, you want to show your best images first - and you want to end with your best image - and since you never know when someone will turn it off, each one has to be your best. Narrative in a reel distracts from the visuals - consider the difference between watching a film, then watching it again with the sound turned off. Yes you want music, and perhaps even sound effects as appropriate on your reel, but avoid redundancy and narrative as much as you can.
Watch 100 reels - and make note to yourself, when do you get bored? How far in? Which reels hold your interest? Which confuse? Which resonate? Borrow ideas from the good, and eschew the bad.
For me - the principles I have adopted that work for me are:
If I don't grab their attention in the first 30 seconds, they will stop watching.
If I don't show that I can shoot appropriate close ups that reveal emotion and the inner thought process of the characters, I will be overlooked for first unit cinematography (movies are 70% close ups)
If they do watch past the first 30 seconds, I am existing on borrowed time. They are likely to stop my reel at any moment - so I have to hold their attention. That means - NO REDUNDANCY - even if two shots are not the same - if they seem similar, seem to be the same, or if one does not add anything new that the other already provided, it is not included.
some people like montage reels - I have never been able to cut one to my satisfaction, so my reel is a series of clips - most of them are on my website, though not linked in order. I think my entire reel might be posted on my agent's site - http://www.thegelleragency.com/ - if not, the clips might be listed at least in the order that they are on my reel. I'm not sure, I haven't looked in ages.
FYI - my current reel, is 3:40 and by my estimation, about 20 seconds too long. I have my features and my commercials divided into separate links. My challenge soon will be what to cut - I already know a few shots from Sea of Dreams that I want to cut, and a few from Lockdown - I want to drop AMW and I have three features that I have shot recently that I have not considered adding yet - so once I do, I'll have to figure out what to do regarding length and structure to keep it short and strong.
I should also add that I have another 4 or 5 features that I shot principal photography on that I have not included on my reel. The work on those is not bad, but it doesn't add anything new that isn't already expressed by the work I have included. It is most important that one's reel is strong, fresh, and brief. Brevity demonstrates respect for your audience, and if they want to see more, you can provide it. They will ask. If you give them too much, you are giving them an opportunity (AN EXCUSE) to say "No" and you do not want that - you need them to make the offer - to say "Yes"
Remember - your letter is meant to get them to look at your resume, your resume to get them to watch your reel, and your reel meant to get them to grant you an interview. The Interview gets you the job. No one hires off a reel. If you can get them to watch your reel first, then you don't need the letter and resume. (When you post a Bio do not make it a narrative version of your resume - write something more personal that is illustrative of the professional that you are without being a retelling of your credentials)
I urge you to build a website where you can place your articles and festival info - a bio, a resume and some clips.
Also - re: your DVD - no on wants to navigate a menu - simply have an opening screen - with your name and title, then a "play" button.
In my case - because I divide my reel between features and commercials - I have a features button that comes up highlighted -(and a commercials button that one can select) if one simply presses "play" or "enter" my features play - I have enabled ffwd and rwd and skip chapter in case the viewer wants to jump around - though I hope they do not - at the end a contact screen opens with my info, my agents info and the features button not highlighted, but the commercials button highlighted - if they press "play" or "enter" again - they will see 3 or 4 commercials - and at the end it returns to the first menu screen with the features button highlighted, but the commercials button not - the viewer can select either features or commercials, but they don't have to.
The more navigating your require, the less likely they are to see what you want to see the way you want them to. The more work for them, the less their impression of you.
Keep it simple. Make the tough choices and sell your best work. Not every frame is a jewel - and not every jewel needs to be shown.
Tighten your reel - keep it moving - find the length that resonates with you - but I would suggest that if you are longer than 4 minutes, you need to be more brutal with it. Keep it brief.
I hope this is somewhat helpful, and constructive (that's my intention). This is a tough market and if you are as brutal about your own work as you can be, you will be able to weather anything else that the nay sayers dish out.
Yesterday I received a request to view an online reel and offer feedback. Here is what I wrote:
ReplyDeleteI think it's good. I think some of the shots can be cut a bit tighter, or perhaps slid slightly to hit the "sweet spot". I'm not crazy about the music. Actually I don't like it all - but it could be generational - so if you like it - keep it.
I do think you could create more energy, more dynamism by cutting on opposing action and varying the shot to shot cuts more - from left to right - to right to left - from CU to wide- - wide to medium to ECU ....light to dark etc.
But overall, I think this is very close and I'm sure it will only get better over time, as you refine it - as you add new footage and remove the weakest shots to replace them with better ones.
To which came the reply:
ReplyDeleteA question for you, do you think its a smart choice to organize the clips as kind of "spots" within the reel, for example, though I have a few shots in the beginning section from one film, the rest of the clips are kind of grouped together for form's sake. I ask only because your reel is also basically organized by film, but the point you bring up about making it dynamic and finding new techniques to cut is really interesting. If I jumbled up the clips from film to film as the reel progresses, that'd give me more ammunition to find the variety you speak of, right? Do you find one would take precedence?
That may be too convoluted to answer, but I think it could also be the question: is an overall form to your reel more or less effective than finding a range of shots that cut together well?
And my answer which followed:
ReplyDeleteBoth formats work. I have often tried to cut a montage but have never been satisfied with it and I can offer two reasons....
1) many of my projects are of various aspect ratios and I find the changing letter boxing to be distracting. If all were of a consistant aspect ratio I may have better success with a montage.
2) while each of my films has an internal consistant look, they are each distinct from one another and so by intetcutting it's a bit disjointed. Also returning to "one look" has the feeling of redundancy whereas within the current clip format I am able to intetcut opposing visuals within each clip without repeating shots or feeling redundant. Then when I move on - I am onto the next.
We each have to find what works for us. And that can change over time as we grow, learn and experiment and as our body of work matures with us.